The problem of inequality
in the distribution of wealth would not be so problematic if the instigators of
envy stop sabotaging the peaceful coexistence of citizens.
Now that health problems are relatively more controlled than a century
ago, socioeconomic inequality is one of the main problems of mankind.
What is a genuine problem is poverty, ie, that state of extreme poverty
in which individuals do not have enough food, shelter and housing shelter to
survive.
The quality of life of those who were destitute, ie, the quality of life
of the poor is a problem magnified largely by envy.
Cause that discomfort is a way to gain applause, as those marked with
moralistic tone that no one can withstand some responsibly owning half the
planet while others even have their own home, is a malicious gesture.
Ally intended verbally with the needy (not homeless) to create enmity
against others. They are insidious.
Not bad report what you have to report. For example : "Mr. A, we
let you know that Mr. B has a thousand times more amenities in your home you”.
If Mr. A does not feel concerned for the tip, fine; if Mr. A reflects
and questions about why so many have such a comfort, perhaps engages find
legitimate ways to match it.
What is tricky is to add to this information a set of comparisons that
will surely stimulate envy against Mr. A Mr. B, whereby the communicator
becomes an instigator, someone who makes advocacy of vandalism, a terrorist
seeking antagonizing them against each other.
This informant, saboteur of peaceful coexistence, has no good intention
deserves leave act on their conspiratorially. He just wants to win the favor of
the poor who may have aggressive stimulate envy he tries to get some profit
from the poor or to receive any benefit from the rich to resort to bribery to
suavizarle so aggressively.
(Este es el Artículo Nº 2.178)
●●●
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario