In this article I propose to think that the distribution of individual wealth is closely associated with the gift of leadership with which everyone is born. If the uneven distribution of wealth responds to a natural characteristic of each, we can better understand why it costs so much better what we consider an unfair distribution of goods.
This view is not very original, but I mention to you that generally is not considered as it deserves.
It is not the same as someone having certain particularities because Nature took care of giving them to the possession by social inefficiency.
The uneven distribution of wealth creates a strong social discomfort considering it relatively easy to regulate.
In our heads is the idea that if society is wrong, society can be rectified. Also in our heads that nature is almost impossible to change : mountain ranges, oceans, temperatures, fauna and flora.
What I propose is that they think the different distribution of wealth is a consequence of the different ability to command that everyone has.
In short, since few individuals are able to lead, while the overwhelming majority are not able to exercise control roles, then we could assume that the assets of each is closely linked to these natural gifts.
From this point of view, the uneven distribution of wealth naturally accompanies the irregular distribution of the gift of command.
Since we can not hope to match us with great football players or with outstanding musicians, perhaps we have failed to improve the distribution of wealth because it is closely associated with individual characteristics that can not be socialized or redistributed more fairly.
It would also be illogical to fight for the wealth distribution of soil or subsoil in a single country, was better distributed.
Note: Original in Spanish (without translation by Google): El enriquecimiento genético.
(Este es el Artículo Nº 2.187)